This thread was inadvertantly removed, as I was deleting suggestions that had already been implemented. I was not aware that deleting the first post would remove the entire thread. So, I apologize to those of you who had posts here with suggestions that had not been used yet.
For everyone's general information, posts or threads that discuss things that have been changed, or occasionally threads that haven't been posted in for a long while, as well as out of date threads that refer to birthdays or holidays that have passed will be deleted. You do not lose karma points when your posts are deleted.
I like full screen. I'm visually impaired, so I usually use a very large font size. Luckily, the links on the bottom of the page are scaleable; the top navigation is not and is totally unreadable to me.
I have 20/20 vision, and I can't read the top navigation either, but if I complain about that again, I think the webmistress will tell my mother on me.
quote:Originally posted by Iris: I have 20/20 vision, and I can't read the top navigation either, but if I complain about that again, I think the webmistress will tell my mother on me.
quote:Originally posted by Iris: I have 20/20 vision, and I can't read the top navigation either, but if I complain about that again, I think the webmistress will tell my mother on me.
I'd just like to say that the moving gallery thingy for the pictures and the tiny boxes that the media and other stuff are in make me crazy. Can those boxes be bigger or done away with altogether? Me no likey. I find that it is a major pain in the bum (and the hand, for those of us with computer related hand injuries). I'd much rather scroll the whole page instead of a small box within a stationary page.
About the conveyor belt o' pictures: I find that I'm impatient and I don't want to wait for the scroll before I can find the pic I want to see. Then when I click on it, it opens in a new window (which is fine) and then when I'm looking at that picture, the next one that I want to see glides off the screen and I have to wait for it to appear again. Kinda frustrating. The scroll itself is kinda cool, but functionally speaking, I'm not sure it's cool enough.
I don't mean to be a pain...just some thoughts.
Woah! That was weird. I just went to look at the gallery and discovered that the old photo page was back, but I'm not sure how I got there...but then it went away...am I dreaming? What was that!?
I think I'd just like a page of thumbnails that I can click on at will. I originally thought the moving pictures were rather dizzying, but found if I lay my cursor over the pictures I can stop or slow down their progress. It's kind of cool in a way, though, to see the scroll of pictures. I've never seen anything quite like it anywhere else, so it's novel Oh drat peeps, I clicked on edit rather than quote. Sorry to have intruded on your post
This message has been edited. Last edited by: Betts01,
You are definitely dreaming peeps. Well, not really, but you are dreaming this post. I didn't really write this.
I love the conveyer belt o' pictures. It's one of the most wicked galleries ever. I am also rather evil and kind of like that you are forced to wait if you are looking for a specific one. I imagine that might change one day though.
I also think the inner boxes are a fraction too small, especially now that the ads are in there, but I like the contained navigation.
Well, I'm glad you like it iris...but it's really not good to make Peeps mad...you know that. The old gallery wasn't that great either since you couldn't see the entire picture plus caption without scrolling (because of the too-small boxes). At least now you can see the smaller pics before you see the larger ones.... But still. Annoyingness (to me, at least). I can't imagine it working well on my dial-up. I just figured I'd share my thoughts because otherwise, how would you know?
Oh my... no, don't want to make peeps mad! I'm sure the gallery annoys more people than you, and I think that at some point it might be modified. But I still think it's way cool. I generally send my many, many thoughts on the site to the webmistress over email or otherwise because it's more convenient for me than posting them on the board. I'm not sure why she hasn't blocked me from her inbox yet. LOL
I thought about sending her an email, but then how would anyone else be able to chime in with a "me too"? Besides, this way, people know that the issue has been brought up and they don't have to think, "hmmm...I bet someone has already brought that up, so I won't bother doing it myself."
Originally posted by snufflepeep: ook ook? Well an "oooga booga" to you, missy! (ook ook?!)
Hee! Should I even try to explain?!? ...I can't. One must nurture an obesession with the works of Ted Raimi to reach that plane of insan-- er... understanding.
Is Ted Raimi the guy about whom I always ask, "Who is Ted Raimi?" or is that someone else? I actually think that is someone else. I ask a lot of "who is..."'s LOL!
I imagine that might change one day though.
